首页 > Promising Practices

Promising Practices

有希望的做法数据库向专业人员和社区成员通报改善社区健康和生活质量的文件化方法.

The ultimate goal is to support the systematic adoption, 实现, and evaluation of successful programs, 实践, and policy changes. The database provides carefully reviewed, 记录, and ranked 实践 that range from good ideas to evidence-based 实践.
Learn more about the ranking methodology.

Submit a Promising Practice

An Effective Practice meets the following HCI criteria:

  1. The program description includes at a minimum: the sponsoring organization, 项目的目标, program 实现 steps, and outcomes that have demonstrated program success and/or promise in achieving the program goal in one or more localities.
  2. 项目评估的结果包括对感兴趣的结果的改进的定量测量.e. increase in voter registration, 不仅仅是选民登记(驱动)和/或结果衡量标准与基线衡量标准或对照组相比有所增加或改善但差异在统计上并不显著.

A 好主意 meets the following HCI criteria:

  1. The program description includes: the sponsoring organization, 项目的目标, program funding source, program 实现 steps and outcomes.
  2. The program evaluation is limited to descriptive measure(s) of success/accomplishment (i.e.、节目参与率、提供的服务/教育课程/电台讯息数目). 注意:通常, 该项目是新实施的，尚未进行项目评估. Programs that have not yet been evaluated, but which show promise in improving 健康 or quality of life, are classified as 好主意s until an evaluation is conducted.

An Evidence-Based Practice meets the following HCI criteria:

  1. The program description includes at a minimum: the sponsoring organization, 项目的目标, program 实现 steps, 以及在一个或多个地区成功实现项目目标的项目成果.
  2. 项目评估的结果包括量化指标，显示项目实施后感兴趣的结果有所改善.e. increase in smoking cessation, not just the delivery of a smoking cessation program). 在干预或计划实施之前和之后的相关时间段比较结果测量值. 另外, 评估研究比较了干预组和适当对照组之间的结果.
  3. The study is of peer-review quality and presents numbers in a scientific manner; measurements of precision and reliability are included (e.g. confidence intervals, 标准错误), 统计检验的结果显示结果测量的显著差异或变化。, and relevant point estimates and p-values are presented. 注:如果一个项目的评估结果以科学的方式呈现，并且与基线测量或对照组相比，结果测量有所改善，但差异没有统计学意义, the practice is classified as effective and not evidence-based.